Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 16
Member
Member
Offline
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 16
Just wanted to get some info or opinions on what's the best route to take with UBB. The fact that UBB 6.x "caches" is a HUGE downfall for high traffic sites. Such sites as hometheaterforum.com have reverted back to the 5.x code because of this. Many webmasters, including myself, have found nothing better than UBB 5.x code. When Infopop decided to do "cache" they really messed up sites with high traffic and use. It won't show up or come into play unless you get that traffic, about 100,000 page views daily and about 150-300 users on-line at once.

The only code that us webmasters have found to handle it without much trouble (regardless of hardware used) is the UBB 5.x code. No one will touch UBB 6 given the state it's currently in and it doesn't look like it will ever get better. If anyone with a LARGE site wants new code they have little choice in what's out there.

My hardware/software specs are:

800 MHZ PIII
512 MB RAM
Duel hardware SCSI-RAID 10GB hard drives
LIXUX OS
PHP
MYSQL
REAL Server Extensions

We are using the dedicated server for both our web site and forum. If we get large enough we might add a second PC dedicated to the forum only. However, the cost is quite expensive and we can get by with the old 5.x code for now.

I was just wondering what, if any choice beside the old code we have for webmasters with high-traffic? VB has also been known to cause major problems as well and we are not looking at that as our long term solution either. Is 5.x still supported by Infopop or here? We need the old 5.47e code and can't find it if that's our only choice right now.

One last note, does anyone know if Infopop will re-code better for high-traffic sites and do away with that **##!! cache junk? It doesn't look that way, but they REALLY need to talk to us like hometheaterforum.com and others that just can't use UBB 6 the way it is. We have no choice it seems but to keep the old 5.x code unless someone does something better.

Regards,

Jeff

Sponsored Links
Entire Thread
Subject Posted By Posted
UBB 6 poor choice for high traffic sites MovieJeff 07/01/2001 6:01 AM
Re: UBB 6 poor choice for high traffic sites qasic 07/01/2001 6:27 AM
Re: UBB 6 poor choice for high traffic sites GoTorankusuKu 07/01/2001 7:41 AM
Re: UBB 6 poor choice for high traffic sites Telekinesis 07/02/2001 8:15 AM

Link Copied to Clipboard
Donate Today!
Donate via PayPal

Donate to UBBDev today to help aid in Operational, Server and Script Maintenance, and Development costs.

Please also see our parent organization VNC Web Services if you're in the need of a new UBB.threads Install or Upgrade, Site/Server Migrations, or Security and Coding Services.
Recommended Hosts
We have personally worked with and recommend the following Web Hosts:
Stable Host
bluehost
InterServer
Visit us on Facebook
Member Spotlight
isaac
isaac
California
Posts: 1,157
Joined: July 2001
Forum Statistics
Forums63
Topics37,575
Posts293,931
Members13,823
Most Online6,139
Sep 21st, 2024
Today's Statistics
Currently Online
Topics Created
Posts Made
Users Online
Birthdays
Top Posters
AllenAyres 21,079
JoshPet 10,369
LK 7,394
Lord Dexter 6,708
Gizmo 5,834
Greg Hard 4,625
Top Posters(30 Days)
Gizmo 1
Top Likes Received
isaac 82
Gizmo 20
Brett 7
WebGuy 2
Morgan 2
Top Likes Received (30 Days)
None yet
The UBB.Developers Network (UBB.Dev/Threads.Dev) is ©2000-2025 VNC Web Services

 
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.1
(Snapshot build 20240918)