Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
D_Wolfwood #209650 04/06/2001 4:24 PM
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 82
Member
Member
Offline
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 82
I hate to be a wet blanket, especially with all of the work that MTO has put into this, but here is my $0.02 (perhaps worth far less than that).

First, I think this sudden effort to move everything along the "top" instead of the "side" is misguided. Reasons:
1) Narrow screen users have far bigger problems than W3T
I use a relatively narrow browser window--narrow enough that I am often irritated by having to scroll horizontally to read text on many popular sites that use fixed-width tables for formatting []/w3timages/icons/frown.gif[/]. I've never felt that there was any need for more room horizontally in W3T's side view. People who feel W3T is too cramped horizontally probably have no hope of tolerating half of the pages on the web. It's time to give up and buy new hardware (sorry to be harsh).
2) Most sites have dead space in the left margin
Many sites have some sort of navigation bar on the left which eats a column of space similar in size to the "side heading" in W3T. If people find the "side heading" leaves too little space to the right they are (again) probably dissatisfied with most of the pages on the web.
3) It is more comfortable to read text that isn't too wide.
People have done studies that show humans can read text best if it isn't too wide or too narrow. To me, these "top" headings leave the body text looking too wide, and hence less readable than the "side" headings.
4) Top headings create a large gap between messages.
To me, the headings seem to disrupt the flow when you are reading. They take far too much vertical space (especially with user pics).

Regarding MTO's B8 which people seem to like, the fact that there is no horizontal line or color variation between the "Posted by" section and the body makes it hard for my eye to find the beginning of the body text. I think MTO's samples show some improvement over the current "top" headings, but I like the current "side" better than all of them (maybe I am whacked).

Now, to try and be more constructive... If people really want to avoid the space waste along the left side width "side" headings, here is my suggestion. Instead of creating a heading that has large vertical size (mostly needed to accomodate the user pic), how about a smaller heading and move the user pic inside the body. Use the usual <img> alignment settings to push it to the upper right corner and let the text flow around it (instead of getting dead or hard to use space to the left). Put the post icons along the lower right of the body and the signature to the lower left (i.e. limit the width of the signature and put the sig and icons into different columns of the same table). Most signatures are pretty small anyway, so icons should be able to fit to the right.

Bill Dimm, MagPortal.com - [:red]free feeds for your site.

Sponsored Links
Entire Thread
Subject Posted By Posted
Wanna play? Rick 04/03/2001 1:33 AM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/03/2001 1:35 AM
A suggestion kimroan 04/03/2001 1:47 AM
Re: A suggestion MTO 04/03/2001 2:45 AM
Re: Wanna play? Brewskie 04/03/2001 3:02 AM
Re: Wanna play? MTO 04/03/2001 3:25 AM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/03/2001 3:38 AM
Re: A suggestion Eileen 04/03/2001 3:39 AM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/03/2001 3:41 AM
Re: Wanna play? patagon 04/03/2001 4:43 AM
Re: Wanna play? patagon 04/03/2001 4:53 AM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/03/2001 6:50 AM
Re: Wanna play? Sharif 04/03/2001 11:19 AM
Re: Wanna play? zap 04/03/2001 12:44 PM
Re: Wanna play? Sharif 04/03/2001 2:24 PM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/03/2001 3:03 PM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/03/2001 3:05 PM
Re: Wanna play? Sharif 04/03/2001 4:29 PM
Re: Wanna play? poil 04/03/2001 6:13 PM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/03/2001 7:07 PM
Re: Wanna play? Brewskie 04/03/2001 8:10 PM
Re: Wanna play? patagon 04/03/2001 8:47 PM
Re: Wanna play? Brewskie 04/03/2001 10:04 PM
Re: A suggestion Rick 04/04/2001 5:32 AM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/04/2001 5:34 AM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/04/2001 5:34 AM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/04/2001 5:35 AM
Re: Wanna play? Derek 04/04/2001 6:48 AM
Re: Wanna play? Derek 04/04/2001 7:04 AM
Re: Wanna play? Derek 04/04/2001 7:18 AM
Re: Wanna play? Derek 04/04/2001 7:32 AM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/04/2001 10:46 AM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/04/2001 3:46 PM
Re: Wanna play? Derek 04/04/2001 4:01 PM
Re: Wanna play? poil 04/04/2001 4:04 PM
Re: Wanna play? Derek 04/04/2001 5:22 PM
Re: Wanna play? The Team 04/04/2001 5:59 PM
Lean Look Derek 04/04/2001 6:20 PM
Re: Lean Look The Team 04/04/2001 6:41 PM
Re: Lean Look Derek 04/04/2001 7:09 PM
Re: Lean Look The Team 04/04/2001 7:32 PM
Re: Lean Look Derek 04/04/2001 7:47 PM
Re: Lean Look The Team 04/04/2001 7:52 PM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/04/2001 7:55 PM
Re: Wanna play? Brewskie 04/04/2001 8:29 PM
Re: Wanna play? Derek 04/04/2001 9:01 PM
Re: Wanna play? MTO 04/04/2001 10:02 PM
Re: Wanna play? Derek 04/04/2001 11:23 PM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/05/2001 4:36 AM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/05/2001 6:44 AM
Re: Wanna play? MTO 04/05/2001 4:46 PM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/05/2001 6:21 PM
Re: Wanna play? Brewskie 04/05/2001 7:05 PM
Re: Wanna play? Brewskie 04/05/2001 7:25 PM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/05/2001 7:35 PM
Re: Wanna play? Brewskie 04/05/2001 8:07 PM
I was thinking more on the lines of... poil 04/05/2001 8:30 PM
Re: Wanna play? MTO 04/05/2001 8:33 PM
Re: Wanna play? patagon 04/05/2001 9:51 PM
Re: Wanna play? Socrates 04/06/2001 3:39 AM
Re: Wanna play? Derek 04/06/2001 5:05 AM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/06/2001 3:15 PM
Re: Wanna play? The Team 04/06/2001 8:23 PM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/06/2001 8:39 PM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/06/2001 9:50 PM
Re: Wanna play? The Team 04/06/2001 9:55 PM
Re: Wanna play? Brewskie 04/06/2001 10:03 PM
Re: Wanna play? BillD 04/06/2001 11:24 PM
Re: Wanna play? Sharif 04/06/2001 11:40 PM
Re: Wanna play? patagon 04/07/2001 12:01 AM
Re: Wanna play? Sharif 04/07/2001 12:15 AM
Re: Wanna play? MTO 04/07/2001 3:22 AM
Re: Wanna play? Jhariden 04/07/2001 4:13 AM
Re: Wanna play? BillD 04/07/2001 4:17 AM
Re: Wanna play? Jhariden 04/07/2001 6:11 AM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/07/2001 6:45 AM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/07/2001 7:13 AM
Re: themes - intermediate solution Sharif 04/07/2001 11:20 AM
Re: Wanna play? MTO 04/07/2001 2:06 PM
Re: Wanna play? sixpack69 04/07/2001 5:16 PM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/07/2001 6:49 PM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/07/2001 7:06 PM
Re: Wanna play? Sharif 04/07/2001 8:38 PM
Re: Wanna play? Brewskie 04/07/2001 9:00 PM
Re: Wanna play? The Team 04/07/2001 9:38 PM
Re: Wanna play? MTO 04/07/2001 10:08 PM
Re: Wanna play? poil 04/08/2001 1:42 AM
Re: Wanna play? kimroan 04/08/2001 2:04 AM
Re: Wanna play? BillD 04/08/2001 4:12 AM
Re: Wanna play? Jhariden 04/08/2001 4:15 AM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/08/2001 4:35 AM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/08/2001 4:41 AM
Re: Wanna play? The Team 04/08/2001 6:42 AM
Re: Wanna play? MTO 04/10/2001 12:55 AM
Re: Wanna play? Brewskie 04/10/2001 2:10 AM

Link Copied to Clipboard
Donate Today!
Donate via PayPal

Donate to UBBDev today to help aid in Operational, Server and Script Maintenance, and Development costs.

Please also see our parent organization VNC Web Services if you're in the need of a new UBB.threads Install or Upgrade, Site/Server Migrations, or Security and Coding Services.
Recommended Hosts
We have personally worked with and recommend the following Web Hosts:
Stable Host
bluehost
InterServer
Visit us on Facebook
Member Spotlight
Gizmo
Gizmo
Portland, OR, USA
Posts: 5,835
Joined: January 2000
Forum Statistics
Forums63
Topics37,575
Posts293,932
Members13,824
Most Online6,139
Sep 21st, 2024
Today's Statistics
Currently Online
Topics Created
Posts Made
Users Online
Birthdays
Top Posters
AllenAyres 21,079
JoshPet 10,369
LK 7,394
Lord Dexter 6,708
Gizmo 5,835
Greg Hard 4,625
Top Posters(30 Days)
Gizmo 1
Top Likes Received
isaac 82
Gizmo 20
Brett 7
WebGuy 2
Top Likes Received (30 Days)
None yet
The UBB.Developers Network (UBB.Dev/Threads.Dev) is ©2000-2025 VNC Web Services

 
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.1
(Snapshot build 20240918)