>> Eileen:
Well, the bigger ones (20x20) are done such size on purpose because I was thinking that they should stand out a little -just a little, not too much. Also, those 5 pixels gave me room to more freedom of design. And since there is no text aligned with them, the size wasnt really needing (in my point of view) to be so much the font height as the rest. The "Reply" and "Edit" are aligned with text, in a row with text, so they do need more like a 15px size. But since these were on their own without text I felt you would probably hardly notice once you see them in place.
Also, they are all the same size, even if they have extra space, so that the mouseover color will show exactly the same size on all.
I guess I cold try at some smaller ones, but not today. []/testimages/icons/wink.gif[/] And they would not be as descriptive, at first I tried doing them that size with no luck. I never really understood the "+" and "-" for collapsed and threaded, this size gave me more room for descriptive drawing.
>> Sixpack69:
The main problem with text in the icons would mean that they are not language dependant. And the icons could get really big if you have to write "Threaded view" inside of one of these... I guess if you really want text you can use the ones that have been under use all life long.
>> Kimroan:
Yes, you can use them. []/testimages/icons/wink.gif[/] They are *allowed* for use on wwwthreads boards. []/testimages/icons/laugh.gif[/]
Mateo Byler
CruceDeCaminos.com
