Provided that it's working the way it is supposed to, the benchmarks i'm running are showing about an average of 25% less CPU time usage:
Benchmark: timing 100 iterations of Original, Rewrite...
Original: 3 wallclock secs ( 0.24 usr + 2.44 sys = 2.68 CPU) @ 37.27/s (n=100)
Rewrite: 2 wallclock secs ( 0.33 usr + 1.71 sys = 2.04 CPU) @ 48.95/s (n=100)
So, if Greg says it's working the way it's supposed to...enjoy
![[Linked Image]](https://ubbdev.com/ubb/smilies/smile.gif)
--mark