Instant Graemlins are not working...

When I use one it comes up as undefined. undefined

I installed the UBB 6 Code Buttons. Is that why? I also notice that it doesn't work here.

It works fine here and my board.

What version of what browser are you using?

IE 4.0.

Good. its not a problem, a 4.0 compatibility issue.

yes its a bug ".="
ubb_new_reply

# pull in instant smilie/ubb code javascript
$direct_to .= $instant_jscript;
&set_page_elements;

".="

allso ne "yes") should be 'yes'

# do graemlins--
if ($in{disable_smilies} ne "yes") { $message = &Smilies("$message"); }

How do I change it?

rob - you didn't show a fix...all you did was tell us how to not interpolate 'yes'.

ubb_new_reply.cgi

# pull in instant smilie/ubb code javascript
$direct_to .= $instant_jscript;
&set_page_elements;

--to--

# pull in instant smilie/ubb code javascript
$direct_to = $instant_jscript;
&set_page_elements;

# do graemlins--
if ($in{disable_smilies} ne "yes") { $message = &Smilies("$message"); }

--to--

# do graemlins--
if ($in{disable_smilies} ne 'yes') { $message = &Smilies("$message"); }

hurrican rob, I tried that and it didn't work. It sill said undefined.

hurrican rob that worked like a champ. Thanks for providing the information.

Madman

It did?!?! AFAICS it doesn't do anything much..

Code

code:

Just SETS $direct_to to $instant_jscript instead of appending the contents; at the end of BOTH ways, $instant_jscript is contained inside $direct_to

Code

code:

Does absolutely nothing. "yes" and 'yes' evaluate to exactly the same thing, since Perl has no boolian type. If it did, then we might see somethign different.

If the contents of $direct_to are large (I dunno what it does- does it contain other HTML?) then the slow loading of that might be causing the problem you're experiencing- is it an older, slower computer that you have IE 4 installed on? If so, the only reason it works now is it's not getting the browser in a twist with too much info to process at once. But the price you pay is reduced browser compatability.

All-in-all, if it works, go for it I guess, but don't blame MM; there's nothing wrong with the original code above, and that "yes" -> 'yes' REALLY is pointless.