PM's by admins - 12/30/2003 6:52 AM
When a user turns off the option to receive PM's, is there a way to make it so an admin can still get one through?
Re: PM's by admins - 12/30/2003 7:07 AM
That *should* be the way that it works. Or it used to.
Admins can always send PMs to anyone. Even if they are off.
Admins can always send PMs to anyone. Even if they are off.
Re: PM's by admins - 12/30/2003 7:21 AM
Okay, I will double check. Thanks
Re: PM's by admins - 12/30/2003 11:17 AM
I know as an admin - I have had it blocked before under 6.3.x - as this user was being a pain - I had to turn him on (his PM's I mean 
) - not sure if this has changed under 6.4.
) - not sure if this has changed under 6.4.
Re: PM's by admins - 12/30/2003 3:40 PM
In the private message file there is coding to override a user's notify setting if your an admin. So thus if you send a user one it goes through.
Re: PM's by admins - 01/04/2004 3:51 AM
[]JoshPet said:
That *should* be the way that it works. Or it used to.
Admins can always send PMs to anyone. Even if they are off. [/]
6.4 nope. PM's off and as admin, Send a private message isn't a 'link' to send one. I have to enable PM's to send members private messages from admin.
That *should* be the way that it works. Or it used to.
Admins can always send PMs to anyone. Even if they are off.
[/]6.4 nope. PM's off and as admin, Send a private message isn't a 'link' to send one. I have to enable PM's to send members private messages from admin.
Re: PM's by admins - 01/04/2004 4:45 AM
No I think you're not understanding.
If the user has decided not to receive PMs, the admin can still PM the user. If the admin turns off the PM ability all together, then nobody can PM.
But the question above was about a user blocking PMs in their profile.
So if PMs are turned off for the whole board, the behavior you describe is correct.
If the user has decided not to receive PMs, the admin can still PM the user. If the admin turns off the PM ability all together, then nobody can PM.
But the question above was about a user blocking PMs in their profile.
So if PMs are turned off for the whole board, the behavior you describe is correct.
Re: PM's by admins - 01/04/2004 5:00 AM
Ok, gottcha. I was hoping as admin I could 'still' send PM's when necessary.
What type of strain do PM's put on threads working in general ? I have 800+ VERY active users.
What type of strain do PM's put on threads working in general ? I have 800+ VERY active users.
Re: PM's by admins - 01/04/2004 5:03 AM
Not much - I would purge inactive messages from time to time (from the admin menu) just to keep the messages table from getting too big.
Re: PM's by admins - 01/04/2004 5:37 AM
ok, thanks Josh
Re: PM's by admins - 01/04/2004 5:38 AM
[]JoshPet said:
Not much - I would purge inactive messages from time to time (from the admin menu) just to keep the messages table from getting too big. [/]
Josh,
In the old w3tthreads version, You would set the number of days, e.g., 30 in the Admin utility and then you could setup a cron task using the "doexpiremessages.pl" file.
Is there a way to do this in 6.4, so that PM's can be deleted from the database on a cron schedule every "x" number of days? (I have the "doexpiremessages.pl file which is configured for the cron if someone would like to look at it.
).
Thanks,
Jeff
Not much - I would purge inactive messages from time to time (from the admin menu) just to keep the messages table from getting too big. [/]
Josh,
In the old w3tthreads version, You would set the number of days, e.g., 30 in the Admin utility and then you could setup a cron task using the "doexpiremessages.pl" file.
Is there a way to do this in 6.4, so that PM's can be deleted from the database on a cron schedule every "x" number of days? (I have the "doexpiremessages.pl file which is configured for the cron if someone would like to look at it.
).Thanks,
Jeff
Re: PM's by admins - 01/04/2004 5:42 AM
There is not currently a cron file for private messages. So I don't know about the old script, but so much has I doubt that the script would work.
We can't really allow it to be posted here, as those script are copyrighted. Probably a new cron script could be written easily in php just by looking at the admin scripts which currently purge the messages.
We can't really allow it to be posted here, as those script are copyrighted. Probably a new cron script could be written easily in php just by looking at the admin scripts which currently purge the messages.
Re: PM's by admins - 01/04/2004 5:47 AM
A simply query to delete all PM's with a unixtimestamp over or equal to 30days will do it. You set that up on a cron task and your set.
<?
// Require the library
require ("/PATH/TO/main.inc.php");
$query = "
DELETE FROM {$config['tbprefix']}Messages
WHERE M_Sent <= UNIX_TIMESTAMP( DATE_SUB(CURDATE(), INTERVAL 30 DAY) )
";
$dbh -> do_query($query);
?>
<?
// Require the library
require ("/PATH/TO/main.inc.php");
$query = "
DELETE FROM {$config['tbprefix']}Messages
WHERE M_Sent <= UNIX_TIMESTAMP( DATE_SUB(CURDATE(), INTERVAL 30 DAY) )
";
$dbh -> do_query($query);
?>
Re: PM's by admins - 01/04/2004 3:08 PM
In order for the moderators also be able to send a pm to everyone, change this check in sendmessage.php and in sendprivate.php (the code is a bit diffdrent in both, but does the same)
to
Question for PHP freaks:
How can I write the above constuct more compact?
Code
<br /><br />if ($AcceptPriv == "no" && $user['U_Status'] != "Administrator") {<br /> $html -> not_right($ubbt_lang['NO_PRIVATE'],$Cat);<br />}<br /> to
Code
<br />if ($AcceptPriv == "no") {<br /> if ($user['U_Status'] != "Administrator"){<br /> if ($user['U_Status'] != "Moderator"){<br /> $html -> not_right($ubbt_lang['NO_PRIVATE'],$Cat);<br /> }<br /> }<br />}<br /><br /> Question for PHP freaks:
How can I write the above constuct more compact?
Re: PM's by admins - 01/04/2004 7:03 PM
[]Anno said:
Question for PHP freaks:
How can I write the above constuct more compact? [/]
if (($AcceptPriv == "no") && ($user['U_Status'] != "Administrator") && ($user['U_Status'] != "Moderator")) {
Then all 3 of those statments would have to be true for it to do what's inside the brackets.
Question for PHP freaks:
How can I write the above constuct more compact? [/]
if (($AcceptPriv == "no") && ($user['U_Status'] != "Administrator") && ($user['U_Status'] != "Moderator")) {
Then all 3 of those statments would have to be true for it to do what's inside the brackets.
Re: PM's by admins - 01/04/2004 9:34 PM
Sounds logically, and I actually tried this before, but it didn´t work for some reason...the mods still couldn´t PM the users.
Then I went the long way.....
Then I went the long way.....
Re: PM's by admins - 01/06/2004 5:28 PM
It seems like you would want an or statement between the admin check and the mod check. If they all have to be true, then a mod wouldn't be able to send the pm...right?
Re: PM's by admins - 01/06/2004 6:08 PM
What JoshPet posted is correct.
if (($AcceptPriv == "no") && ($user['U_Status'] != "Administrator") && ($user['U_Status'] != "Moderator")) {
I have done this on a person's server and works fine. I would look at your syntax and make sure it is exact.
if (($AcceptPriv == "no") && ($user['U_Status'] != "Administrator") && ($user['U_Status'] != "Moderator")) {
I have done this on a person's server and works fine. I would look at your syntax and make sure it is exact.
Re: PM's by admins - 01/07/2004 12:57 PM
I didn't use the qotes around the criteria, I just inserted
&& $user['U_Status'] != "Moderator"
to the check that was there from infopop....perhaps that´s the cause.
Anyway, it works both ways, lucky me
&& $user['U_Status'] != "Moderator"
to the check that was there from infopop....perhaps that´s the cause.
Anyway, it works both ways, lucky me