|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 20
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 20 |
It is crucial that people be able to destroy the layout of my board.  Version 6.5 doesnt not allow some to post the BODY command within a post (version 6.3 allowed this). What file and what line do I need to edit? Thanks
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,042 Likes: 7
Moderator
|
Moderator
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,042 Likes: 7 |
quote: It is crucial that people be able to destroy the layout of my board. Why in gods name would you want to do that?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 21,079 Likes: 3
I type Like navaho
|
I type Like navaho
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 21,079 Likes: 3 |
just allow them to upload php and cgi files.... I'm sure they could destroy your site easily with that 
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 20
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 20 |
ahahaha. My site has always been one based on havoc and free will. With the release of 6.5 the "forced" blocking of the BODY tag annoys me. They should have made it an option.
So, what do I change?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 21,079 Likes: 3
I type Like navaho
|
I type Like navaho
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 21,079 Likes: 3 |
I don't think you'll find someone willingly giving out that info, and it would never be an option in any case  You should be able to find the appropriate subroutine in ubb_lib_posting.cgi I believe 
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 20
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 20 |
Why would they not give that info out? Its a simple feature that was added somewhere between 6.3 and 6.5. Its not in that file though. Does anyone know or is all just guess work?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 21,079 Likes: 3
I type Like navaho
|
I type Like navaho
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 21,079 Likes: 3 |
It's not a 'feature', it's a plugged security hole... your forum is possibly the only one on the internet (including *all* forum scripts) that would not want it patched. I'm not sure who you could ask...
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 20
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 20 |
Apparently no one has a clue. Amazing how the supposed "programers" jsut dont know. I'll tell you why the forced block is not good:
1 - My users are knuckleheads and like to display background images on their posts for uniqueness and creativity
2 - My users embed audio clips in the posts which is VERY funny to hear when you read a post.
3 - The BODY TAG feature does nothing to UBB. It simply overr-rides the existing BODY tag which only affects the layout of that particular topic (not the entire website).
SOMEONE has to have a clue. For me to find it and disable it would not say much for the creators of UBB who cant seem to locate the block.
Posting the answer here would not cause any security issues at all since its editing a file that no one has access to. Any dummy knows that hacking ANY cgi file related to UBB could kill it totally. If someone knows and doesnt want to post just email me or request me to email you.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 5,073
Admin Emeritus
|
Admin Emeritus
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 5,073 |
The same subroutine that prohibits the body tag also prohibits many other elements, including embed and object. It's called check_html_core, and is in ubb_lib.
We do not hand out exact instructions on how to give your UBB security problems large enough for a Mack truck to drive through.
UBB.classic: Love it or hate it, it was mine.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 20
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 20 |
Version 6.3.1 did not have any such blocks so why the sudden move to block all embded html when there were X number of versions prior that didnt have the block either?
But as annoying as it is I can only guess that UBB had good reasons because classic used to be the most unstable script I had ever run and now its quite reliable. The block is just something I wasnt prepared for.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 5,073
Admin Emeritus
|
Admin Emeritus
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 5,073 |
Body, embed, object, and all the rest have been blocked since the 5 series days. You must have removed the filtering in the version you were using.
UBB.classic: Love it or hate it, it was mine.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 20
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 20 |
No sir  Seriously. I had several 5 versions then jumped to 6.3.1 and left it totally original. Not 1 single add-on at all. We used to be able to just add the BODY command to a post and change the background image on that post alone. BUT, I did upgrade from 5x to the 6.3.1 so, possibly, an older file was not over written? Thats the only thing I can think of.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 5,073
Admin Emeritus
|
Admin Emeritus
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 5,073 |
Trust me, I wrote the code myself. Those tags have been blocked for ages.
UBB.classic: Love it or hate it, it was mine.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 21,079 Likes: 3
I type Like navaho
|
I type Like navaho
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 21,079 Likes: 3 |
quote: Originally posted by Nycore: Apparently no one has a clue. Amazing how the supposed "programers" jsut dont know. ... SOMEONE has to have a clue. For me to find it and disable it would not say much for the creators of UBB who cant seem to locate the block.
WELL.... since you asked all nice and such.. :rolleyes: Charles is the guy who's written the ubb code since the days of 6.01, I'm sure he has a clue... he's told you where to find it, run along now and play nice with the other kids...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,080
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,080 |
Wassup everyone. And so...What have I missed? 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 21,079 Likes: 3
I type Like navaho
|
I type Like navaho
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 21,079 Likes: 3 |
heheh 
|
|
|
Donate to UBBDev today to help aid in Operational, Server and Script Maintenance, and Development costs.
Please also see our parent organization VNC Web Services if you're in the need of a new UBB.threads Install or Upgrade, Site/Server Migrations, or Security and Coding Services.
|
|
Posts: 417
Joined: November 2001
|
|
Forums63
Topics37,575
Posts293,930
Members13,823
|
Most Online6,139 Sep 21st, 2024
|
|
Currently Online
Topics Created
Posts Made
Users Online
Birthdays
|
|
|
|
|
|
|