UBB.Developers Forums UBB.classic V6 MultiHack Mods [6.0-6.3] Quick Reply Form.

Here's link to my hack.
Quick reply form with CP Maintenance:
download!

unfortunately, there is no demoboard in Internet right now.
6.3 fully compliant

Good job, but (as I said somewhere else) - it's not quick anymore

Isn't there already another Quick Reply hack out there? Whats the difference between this one and the other?

CP maintenance in mine hack, more features.
version compatibility (mine is for 6.0x, 6.1x, other is for 6.3)

Mines quick, his isn't.

And yours saves bandwidth, his costs even more But his still has more features.

I'll give you comments after I see a demo, I'm not gonna install a bandwidth eater in my board

just tested it on 6.3. worx ok...
but, still there is no demo. and there will be no demo unless somebody installs my hack and posts here an URL.

2 LK:

why do you think that my QAF costs even more. It can't be true.
Compare:
Full reply page (with sidebars, options, and other stuff)
and form (with only three boxes, and! you can turn them off from CP (so it will be like Greg Hard's hack.)
The main feature of my hack - it's completely customizable).

nice work rav3n, let me know when you have a demo, I'd like to check it out.

Okay, it's good if you can turn it off, but I'm happy with my quickreply box

Infopop's Javascript is large to say the least.
Here's my cut down version of the DoPrompt Javascript function...

[code][/code]Also change all the "DoSmilie"'s to "um"'s in the $smilie_list
code in public common.

then you can remove the DoSmilie JS function.
IP's code size: 3328bytes
My Code size: 923bytes
(that includes the Smilie code change thingy)

maybe I should doc that as a template hack? hmm

If it's not quick I'll stick to Greg & LK's version.

2 AllenAyres

i wish i could provide an url to demoboard, but i can't. let me explain the reason...
this hack was specially written for one site, but site was closed, and i have no license for UBB 6.x.x
that's why there will be no demo.

2 all:
you all think only about saving of bandwidth and nobody cares about user comfort.

Just bug someone to install it for you then.

JTLYK, it's not compliant with 6.3 and 6.2 well - you have to use the new subs Charles made, such as WriteHashToFile, instead of the regular ones, such as open(), etc.

i don't know code of 6.2-6.3 very well. anything else?
but it should work on 6.3.

BTW, i can post a couple of sreenshots of my QAF in this thread.

So do it please

compact form with all features turned on.


compact form. bandwidth-saving settings:


full form. bandwidth-eating settings:


yeah, i've found a bug. it worx in 6.3, but doesn't display HTML/UBB wordings and "Show sig" and "Disable smilies".
What's wrong? again, i don't know about 6.3 code very much.

deleted.
Sorry, there was stupid question, i already found answer myself.

link gone, can i get a working one?