|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 20
Junior Member
|
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 20 |
Is there an easy way to enable this? I have a closed board, and lots of ppl are upset because of the severe limitations of UBBCode.  Eric
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,042 Likes: 7
Moderator
|
|
Moderator
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,042 Likes: 7 |
Whoops, Sorry lk. I retract my statement.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 4,625
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 4,625 |
No you can't. Due to security no html is enabled in sigs at all by default.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 20
Junior Member
|
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 20 |
Simple things, like Center, or Tables would be nice. Is there a UBB addon for this type of thing?
Eric
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,394
Admin / Code Breaker
|
|
Admin / Code Breaker
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,394 |
brett, you're wrong, it's very easy to exploit the HTML feature through UBB - it's almost impossible to block EVERYTHING from IE. Smokester, try 6.0/6.1/6.2 forum, I think wwb made one for 6.2 and it might work for 6.3 as well
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 20
Junior Member
|
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 20 |
In your opinion though, it sounds like HTML is a really bad idea for sigs... Perhaps I'll forget about it for now. Eric
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 151
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 151 |
Is it possible to further explain why HTML is so much more dangerous in sigs than on the rest of the board?
It seems like Infopop would allow the owners of the boards the power to disable or enable HTML in sigs. With enough warnings as to why it should not be enabled, why not allow the UBB owner (ahem licensee) the ability to chance that themselves?
In an earlier version (around 5 I think) I had installed a mod that allowed HTML in sigs - never had any problems but the people who join my board are not trouble makers.
Actually to enable HTML on a per user basis with the default as disabled for new users would really be ideal. That way new users - who intend to attack and disrupt are prevented - while known users are enabled.
As stated earlier, the main reason is for image attributes (so sig text can appear beside the image), centering, font coloring and size.
Why not allow the owners to make that decision?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,849
Spotlight Winner
|
|
Spotlight Winner
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,849 |
Hahaha, I love the last line of the hack... quote:
BE careful !!!!
watch out for any users who try to upload a virus in his signature to your computer.
Sorry, I'm not sure why it didn't work but you might be better off with the advanced UBB code instead. Charles Capps looked at it and gave it a positive nod and once it's installed it works in the sigs. I installed the version for 6.2.x and left out what I didn't need.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7
Junior Member
|
|
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7 |
ok i'll try that thanx a lot
|
|
|
Donate to UBBDev today to help aid in Operational, Server and Script Maintenance, and Development costs.
Please also see our parent organization VNC Web Services if you're in the need of a new UBB.threads Install or Upgrade, Site/Server Migrations, or Security and Coding Services.
|
|
|
Posts: 808
Joined: July 2001
|
|
|
Forums63
Topics37,573
Posts293,925
Members13,849
| |
Most Online5,166
Sep 15th, 2019
|
|
Currently Online
Topics Created
Posts Made
Users Online
Birthdays
|
|
|
|
|
|
