|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,273
That 70's Guy
|
That 70's Guy
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,273 |
If anyone has some information on how to go about accessing my Windows XP NTFS partition from RedHat 9.0 using the smp kernel please let me know. I'm having a heck of a time getting various files moved over. I just took a long way around to get my Outlook email moved. LoL I can explain how to do that if anyone wants. (Outlook -> Evolution 1.4)  Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,759
Addict
|
Addict
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,759 |
Hmm.. I've mounted NTFS on RH7.3.. not sure if 9 is any different. Let me grab my linux box and see if it would be the same for both.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,759
Addict
|
Addict
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,759 |
Hmm.. how nice of RH, drivers for NTFS are not included in the distribution. So the first thing you need to do is download the NTFS RPMs http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/info/redhat.html But it also says this driver is NOT for SMP... can cause problems under high load EDIT: Also looks like you need to recompile the kernel to load the ntfs module... That sucks, in 7.3 it only took me a few minutes to edit a line in fstab
Last edited by Jeremy; 08/15/2003 2:41 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,273
That 70's Guy
|
That 70's Guy
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,273 |
Yes it's rather wonderfull that I'm between a rock and a hard place... lol I may just install Mandrake along side of everything else and then I believe I could move files as needed? Everything I'm doing is the long way around things but I guess it has to be... lol 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,759
Addict
|
Addict
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,759 |
I believe mandrake is ntfs friendly, at least when I installed mandrake 8 it was  How much data are you talking about? If it is just a few gigs, could just burn it on a few CDs and be quicker.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,223
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,223 |
It's time to build your own kernel Dave.
You're better off doing that anyway. I don't have a stock kernel in anything I own or work on. Just remember.... module module module! Get te latest source and have a ball.
Hopefully you are using GRUB. If your machine fails to boot you just boot into the older kernel (you didn't delete it, right?) and fix the new one.
Picture perfect penmanship here.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,768
Addict
|
Addict
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,768 |
Semi-OT, but which CD file system would be best for Linux/Windows compatibility: ISO9660, Joliet or UDF?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,273
That 70's Guy
|
That 70's Guy
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,273 |
I'll do the CD burning route to get a few things going as quickly as possibly. Thanks. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,223
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,223 |
Picture perfect penmanship here.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,768
Addict
|
Addict
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,768 |
Thanks 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,273
That 70's Guy
|
That 70's Guy
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,273 |
Yes I'm using Grub.  I will definately be digging in deeper and compiling my own kernel sounds like a good way to get there. LoL (hope I don't end up regretting it)  For now though I just need to get moving as soon as possible. It wasnt untill I hadn't a choice in operating systems did I notice what I was all dependant on in windows. Now finding replacements for them in linux is about over and I may sleep a bit better tonight. LoL 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,223
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,223 |
Dave, making your own kernel is SO so easy. And best of all, if you munge it up you just choose a different kernel in the grub options and go back as you were. As I said, try to make anything a module that you can. makes the kernel smaller, only loads what is neede when needed. get the source at kernel.org and go to http://kernelnewbies.org/ for instructions. http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/index.php3#compile that one shows them using lilo there at the end. you're using grub so it's even easier. just edit grub.conf. Use makemenuconfig by the way. That's the better one to use. You can choose ? for every menu option. It will show a brief desciption and a recommended selection option.
Picture perfect penmanship here.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,273
That 70's Guy
|
That 70's Guy
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,273 |
Thanks Nav  On a side note I gave up on using Evolution and have opted for Mozilla's Thunderbird. So far so good. I have everything (emial) moved over and am dealing. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,191
Kahuna
|
Kahuna
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,191 |
Evolution resembles a lot the look and feel of Outlook and it is fairly similar in terms of functionality etc.
Despite being on Windows I have also dumped Outlook and went to Thunderbird. Much much better program and some of the things that are missing are already being addressed.
Nikos
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,273
That 70's Guy
|
That 70's Guy
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,273 |
Yes I really do like the look/feel of Thunderbird. It's still in the early stages but considering that it's fantastic. 
|
|
|
Donate to UBBDev today to help aid in Operational, Server and Script Maintenance, and Development costs.
Please also see our parent organization VNC Web Services if you're in the need of a new UBB.threads Install or Upgrade, Site/Server Migrations, or Security and Coding Services.
|
|
badfrog
somewhere on the coast of Maine
Posts: 94
Joined: March 2007
|
|
Forums63
Topics37,575
Posts293,930
Members13,823
|
Most Online6,139 Sep 21st, 2024
|
|
Currently Online
Topics Created
Posts Made
Users Online
Birthdays
|
|
|
|