[]ChAoS said:
So what do you think of the latter? Would it be usefull or just a matter of preference? [/]
Well it's just not the best way to go about it even if you could get it running perfectly. More inefficient compared to doing it client-side which is designed for this kind of thing :-)
PS - I added a tweak to the Javascript so that it no longer always starts cycling on the 1st image after a refresh, but rather chooses one randomly now and then cycles in order from there. This helps to ensure better coverage of the group.
