Tell ya what Matt, let me tell you how I see it. When w3.org's
own webpage validates without warnings then I will worry or care about it. Who are they to tell me what is or is not valid when they cannot get it right themselves?
I have on word for it, and it starts with bull...............
All I care about is whether it looks alright in Nescape and I.E. Have you ever noticed that what they call "valid" does not render the same in both browsers? You may say that one of the browsers is broke. I call that a cop out and say your HTML is broke if you can't code for both of them and make it look the same in each.
Every bit of HTML code that
I have ever done looked exactly the same in Netscape as it did in I.E., but yet it's not valid HTML? Bull..............
