|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 39
User
|
User
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 39 |
Introduce a mix of the flat/threaded mode by having a mode where ALL replies to a post are showed in flat mode. All the subsequent replies to the replies should not be shown.
This will have the effect of presenting all the answers to a given post that belong to the same level so to speak, thus producing a logically consistent subview of any given thread-tree.
For example, consider this scenario with posts on various levels:
1 (starting post) --2 ---3 ----4 ----4 ----4 ---3 ---3 --2 --2
Now, what I suggest is that when you choose post 1, all the 2's are shown as well (in flat mode that is- perhaps a little indented). Likewise, when you choose post 2, all the level 3 posts are shown as well...and so on.
I think this (for most boards and topics) will produce a coherent image of the post and its answer(s), while still maintaining the tidyness of the threaded mode.
Of course, all the displayed post should be clearly marked in the threaded wiew below.
Tim
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 796
Addict
|
Addict
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 796 |
Sounds interesting.  One observation, though: It would always work right on level 2, as they are necessarily replies to the original post. But after that level, there can be different lines of levels, take for example: 1 (starting post) --2 ---3 ----4 ----4 ----4 ---3 ---3 --2 ---3 ---3 By displaying level 2, they are all replies to subject 1. By displaying level 3, you end up showing replies to two different posts, and at the end they could be different subjects.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1
Lurker
|
Lurker
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1 |
Actually, I think in the example, the #s should not denote the threading level.
Instead of:
1 (starting post) --2 ---3 ----4 ----4 ----4 ---3 ---3 --2 ---3 ---3
It should be more like:
1 (starting post) --1.1 ---1.1.1 ----1.1.1.1 ----1.1.1.2 ----1.1.1.3 ---1.1.2 ---1.1.3 --1.2 ---1.2.1 ---1.2.2
So in the threaded/flat model, if you were viewing message 1.1, you would only see (optional # replies):
1.1 -1.1.1 (3 replies) -1.1.2 -1.1.3
You would no see 1.2.1, etc.
Yeah, I bet this is as clear as mud!
Kiliman
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 1,715
Addict
|
Addict
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 1,715 |
That makes a bit more sense and even though I wouldn't use it (I think) it would be nice if the feature was added. Everything to make users be able to view the forums the way they want to.
Actually, I would like to have a link from postlist to view a thread in flat mode even though I usually browse in threaded mode. Sometimes I only want to take a quick look at the posts and this would spare one click. Right now I have to click on the post and then on the flat mode link.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 39
User
|
User
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 39 |
[] Actually, I think in the example, the #s should not denote the threading level...etc... I stand corrected Thanks 
Last edited by voidvoid; 08/08/2002 4:04 PM.
|
|
|
Donate to UBBDev today to help aid in Operational, Server and Script Maintenance, and Development costs.
Please also see our parent organization VNC Web Services if you're in the need of a new UBB.threads Install or Upgrade, Site/Server Migrations, or Security and Coding Services.
|
|
Posts: 5,833
Joined: January 2000
|
|
Forums63
Topics37,575
Posts293,930
Members13,823
|
Most Online6,139 Sep 21st, 2024
|
|
Currently Online
Topics Created
Posts Made
Users Online
Birthdays
|
|
|
|