|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,369
I type Like navaho
|
I type Like navaho
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,369 |
 IE is slow as dirt on the Mac these days. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,759
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,759 |
Safari => Konqueror
Camino (was Chimera) => Mozilla
I use both, Safari by default, Camino for those pages in which javascript breaks in Safari
IE won't be missed.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 37
User
|
User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 37 |
I too am not too worried about no more IE. The OS X version was kind-of crap anyway. I'm more worried about the few sites out there that literally check your browser and if its not IE6 they won't let you in. I know you can set Safari to try and fool such sites, but I've ran into a couple that still blocked me from getting in. One even had the nerve to tell me I had to be using Windows to get in, sheesh!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 21,079 Likes: 3
I type Like navaho
|
I type Like navaho
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 21,079 Likes: 3 |
heheh, eejits  It was a loss-leader for them... not sure what kinda licensing deals they had going, but it musta been not enough to keep it going 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,191
Kahuna
|
Kahuna
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,191 |
And they had stopped IE for Unix as well some time ago. So it is only the Windows platforms....
Nikos
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,273
That 70's Guy
|
That 70's Guy
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,273 |
Anyone designing for IE specifically is still trying to ride Microsoft's coat tails to some sort of glory. Since Longhorn isn't scheduled untill 2005 and there is no new IE versions till then I hope the other browsers gain much more ground during that time. People building their sites without standards compliancy in mind are painting themselves into a corner. Honestly, I don't miss IE at all. I do have it around for testing but that's it. I have to think what possibly could Microsoft do for IE 7 that would make people want to switch to Longhorn to be able to use it? Make my coffee? Do the dishes? Adding more feature bloat isn't going to make it better. I intend on making my sites standards compliant and if for some reason that breaks IE in certain cases then so be it. If the world changes regardless of Microsoft they will eventually have to follow. </soapbox> 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,759
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,759 |
Yes, thank goodness for W3C and the various validators. Pfft on Micro$oft 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,025
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,025 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,609
Addict
|
Addict
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,609 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,268
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,268 |
IE for the Mac is, IMHO, the most standards non-compliant browser on the planet! I get more complaint about web pages not displaying properly on IE for the Mac than I do any other browser. As long as I script my pages to be XML compliant the complaints are non existent unless the user is running IE for the Mac.
I for one am glad to see it go the way of the dinosaur! If you are a Mac user you're suppose to "think different" -so why use a MS application anyway...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,471
Addict
|
Addict
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,471 |
I think that award definetly goes to NS 4.5 and 4.7x. You have the choice if you want to be standard compilant or support NS 4.x.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,268
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,268 |
Very true, but most people have heard about the problems with NS 4.7 and avoid it like a venereal disease. IF they persist in claiming that there is a scripting error on my site I can direct them to several web sites that detail the bugs in NS 4.7. With IE for the Mac there are actually a few Mac web sites that claim it is the most standards compliant browser -so try convincing a Mac user that the error they are seeing on your page is caused by their browser...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,025
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,025 |
MS, standards compliant. That's a laugh. Embrace, extend, extinguish. That's how MS's handles standards.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,268
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,268 |
[] slayer60 said:MS, standards compliant. That's a laugh. Embrace, extend, extinguish. That's how MS's handles standards. [/] They tried all that and failed. An example is the TCP / IP stack in Windows XP and 2000 -it's the same stack that BSDI Unix uses 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 206
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 206 |
Unix IE? Never heard of that one for some reason..
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,268
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,268 |
It's like saying "jumbo shrimp" 
|
|
|
Donate to UBBDev today to help aid in Operational, Server and Script Maintenance, and Development costs.
Please also see our parent organization VNC Web Services if you're in the need of a new UBB.threads Install or Upgrade, Site/Server Migrations, or Security and Coding Services.
|
|
Posts: 1,157
Joined: July 2001
|
|
Forums63
Topics37,575
Posts293,931
Members13,823
|
Most Online6,139 Sep 21st, 2024
|
|
Currently Online
Topics Created
Posts Made
Users Online
Birthdays
|
|
|
|