Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Sally #209657 04/06/2001 11:11 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 76
Journeyman
Journeyman
Offline
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 76
Okay, I am not going to make very many people happy with me after this post, but I have to speak my feelings on this entire avalanche of “We need a new look and feel!!” bit. I applaud you all on trying to improve the forums. I think you all have some wonderful ideas. However, I personally do not like any of the samples shown. I often am in very strong favor of the options that each of you has posted over time here in this very forum. But I must disagree about the new looks I’m seeing displayed in this forum.

I won’t beat around the bush... I like where Scream was already going to the new “Post Options”. Lower left hand corner of the body of the message is just fine. That for the short term is fine. If the width of your display is a concern, use the “Top” view. Don’t take away what our user base has come to know and enjoy. We’ve been using WWWThreads for over a year and a half and in a three-day period of time come a rush of requests to change the flat display. Frankly, I am totally against it.

I am sure that you folks each have your own user base to concern yourselves with and while the current flat layout may not be perfect, it’s what our visitors are comfortable with and I know our visitors and their mentality. Forcing such a dramatic change would KILL us for weeks if not months before we recovered. I simply would not upgrade the script any longer if one of those designs were used. A couple of people complained because Scream hinted (only hinted!) that the “top” view might be removed since it was used by so few. I decided to check for myself to see exactly how many of our users use the “side” header vs the “top” header and these stats speak for themselves. There is no further explanation needed, it is a cold hard fact, over 96% of our user base prefer the “side” view.
+---------------+----------+
| U_Post_Format | count(*) |
+---------------+----------+
| side | 53186 |
| top | 230 |
+---------------+----------+
2 rows in set (11.48 sec)
We’re not talking about a few hundred or thousand users but instead over 53,000 users. So please excuse my firm stance on this particular issue. What is being proposed here would have a dramatic impact on our entire user base. If I may, I’d prefer to offer another option. One that could please all of us... well, maybe not Scream. []/w3timages/icons/wink.gif[/]

Change the WWWThreads so that we’re no longer forced to a specific layout. Move to a template based system that allows for us to place the various features anywhere we like. For example, for each section of the page, create a variable name that we can use in our template design. The folks at Gossamer Threads have the right idea. If you look at their scripts, they use a template system that is very flexible.

For example, they use variables you may place in your HTML templates, which gives you an exceptional amount of freedom in designing your pages. Here are some examples of keywords/variables you could use for WWWThreads (enough to cover my example for the flat view):

[%MainMenu%]
[%NavTree%]
[%NavigationButtons%]
[%PostHeader%]
[%PostTopic%]
[%PostButtons%]
[%PostIcons%]

In this image below is the standard flat view from the current “live” forums that Scream has running. I’ve removed the data display to show you what a “template” using these variables could look like. Notice that once you have such variables to work with, you change the layout and design of your page to anything you want, and every single one of us would have our ideal layout. []/w3timages/icons/smile.gif[/]

[]http://vwdesigns.com/images/variables.jpg[/]

This is the direction I think we should be moving, to provide more flexibility, not take away options that many people have come to know and truly enjoy.

I really think this sort of system would open the door for a lot more diversity from one wwwthreads site to the next and pave the way for some really interesting websites that could then further merge features across the board. In any event, if I have upset you, I apologize up front, but I already know the reaction we’d receive if we switched to any of the layouts displayed in this thread.

Jhariden (aka Strategist)
Stratics Forums

Sponsored Links
Entire Thread
Subject Posted By Posted
Wanna play? Rick 04/03/2001 1:33 AM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/03/2001 1:35 AM
A suggestion kimroan 04/03/2001 1:47 AM
Re: A suggestion MTO 04/03/2001 2:45 AM
Re: Wanna play? Brewskie 04/03/2001 3:02 AM
Re: Wanna play? MTO 04/03/2001 3:25 AM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/03/2001 3:38 AM
Re: A suggestion Eileen 04/03/2001 3:39 AM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/03/2001 3:41 AM
Re: Wanna play? patagon 04/03/2001 4:43 AM
Re: Wanna play? patagon 04/03/2001 4:53 AM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/03/2001 6:50 AM
Re: Wanna play? Sharif 04/03/2001 11:19 AM
Re: Wanna play? zap 04/03/2001 12:44 PM
Re: Wanna play? Sharif 04/03/2001 2:24 PM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/03/2001 3:03 PM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/03/2001 3:05 PM
Re: Wanna play? Sharif 04/03/2001 4:29 PM
Re: Wanna play? poil 04/03/2001 6:13 PM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/03/2001 7:07 PM
Re: Wanna play? Brewskie 04/03/2001 8:10 PM
Re: Wanna play? patagon 04/03/2001 8:47 PM
Re: Wanna play? Brewskie 04/03/2001 10:04 PM
Re: A suggestion Rick 04/04/2001 5:32 AM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/04/2001 5:34 AM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/04/2001 5:34 AM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/04/2001 5:35 AM
Re: Wanna play? Derek 04/04/2001 6:48 AM
Re: Wanna play? Derek 04/04/2001 7:04 AM
Re: Wanna play? Derek 04/04/2001 7:18 AM
Re: Wanna play? Derek 04/04/2001 7:32 AM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/04/2001 10:46 AM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/04/2001 3:46 PM
Re: Wanna play? Derek 04/04/2001 4:01 PM
Re: Wanna play? poil 04/04/2001 4:04 PM
Re: Wanna play? Derek 04/04/2001 5:22 PM
Re: Wanna play? The Team 04/04/2001 5:59 PM
Lean Look Derek 04/04/2001 6:20 PM
Re: Lean Look The Team 04/04/2001 6:41 PM
Re: Lean Look Derek 04/04/2001 7:09 PM
Re: Lean Look The Team 04/04/2001 7:32 PM
Re: Lean Look Derek 04/04/2001 7:47 PM
Re: Lean Look The Team 04/04/2001 7:52 PM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/04/2001 7:55 PM
Re: Wanna play? Brewskie 04/04/2001 8:29 PM
Re: Wanna play? Derek 04/04/2001 9:01 PM
Re: Wanna play? MTO 04/04/2001 10:02 PM
Re: Wanna play? Derek 04/04/2001 11:23 PM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/05/2001 4:36 AM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/05/2001 6:44 AM
Re: Wanna play? MTO 04/05/2001 4:46 PM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/05/2001 6:21 PM
Re: Wanna play? Brewskie 04/05/2001 7:05 PM
Re: Wanna play? Brewskie 04/05/2001 7:25 PM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/05/2001 7:35 PM
Re: Wanna play? Brewskie 04/05/2001 8:07 PM
I was thinking more on the lines of... poil 04/05/2001 8:30 PM
Re: Wanna play? MTO 04/05/2001 8:33 PM
Re: Wanna play? patagon 04/05/2001 9:51 PM
Re: Wanna play? Socrates 04/06/2001 3:39 AM
Re: Wanna play? Derek 04/06/2001 5:05 AM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/06/2001 3:15 PM
Re: Wanna play? The Team 04/06/2001 8:23 PM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/06/2001 8:39 PM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/06/2001 9:50 PM
Re: Wanna play? The Team 04/06/2001 9:55 PM
Re: Wanna play? Brewskie 04/06/2001 10:03 PM
Re: Wanna play? BillD 04/06/2001 11:24 PM
Re: Wanna play? Sharif 04/06/2001 11:40 PM
Re: Wanna play? patagon 04/07/2001 12:01 AM
Re: Wanna play? Sharif 04/07/2001 12:15 AM
Re: Wanna play? MTO 04/07/2001 3:22 AM
Re: Wanna play? Jhariden 04/07/2001 4:13 AM
Re: Wanna play? BillD 04/07/2001 4:17 AM
Re: Wanna play? Jhariden 04/07/2001 6:11 AM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/07/2001 6:45 AM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/07/2001 7:13 AM
Re: themes - intermediate solution Sharif 04/07/2001 11:20 AM
Re: Wanna play? MTO 04/07/2001 2:06 PM
Re: Wanna play? sixpack69 04/07/2001 5:16 PM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/07/2001 6:49 PM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/07/2001 7:06 PM
Re: Wanna play? Sharif 04/07/2001 8:38 PM
Re: Wanna play? Brewskie 04/07/2001 9:00 PM
Re: Wanna play? The Team 04/07/2001 9:38 PM
Re: Wanna play? MTO 04/07/2001 10:08 PM
Re: Wanna play? poil 04/08/2001 1:42 AM
Re: Wanna play? kimroan 04/08/2001 2:04 AM
Re: Wanna play? BillD 04/08/2001 4:12 AM
Re: Wanna play? Jhariden 04/08/2001 4:15 AM
Re: Wanna play? Eileen 04/08/2001 4:35 AM
Re: Wanna play? Rick 04/08/2001 4:41 AM
Re: Wanna play? The Team 04/08/2001 6:42 AM
Re: Wanna play? MTO 04/10/2001 12:55 AM
Re: Wanna play? Brewskie 04/10/2001 2:10 AM

Link Copied to Clipboard
Donate Today!
Donate via PayPal

Donate to UBBDev today to help aid in Operational, Server and Script Maintenance, and Development costs.

Please also see our parent organization VNC Web Services if you're in the need of a new UBB.threads Install or Upgrade, Site/Server Migrations, or Security and Coding Services.
Recommended Hosts
We have personally worked with and recommend the following Web Hosts:
Stable Host
bluehost
InterServer
Visit us on Facebook
Member Spotlight
Zarzal
Zarzal
Berlin, Germany
Posts: 808
Joined: July 2001
Forum Statistics
Forums63
Topics37,575
Posts293,931
Members13,823
Most Online6,139
Sep 21st, 2024
Today's Statistics
Currently Online
Topics Created
Posts Made
Users Online
Birthdays
Top Posters
AllenAyres 21,079
JoshPet 10,369
LK 7,394
Lord Dexter 6,708
Gizmo 5,834
Greg Hard 4,625
Top Posters(30 Days)
Gizmo 1
Top Likes Received
isaac 82
Gizmo 20
Brett 7
WebGuy 2
Morgan 2
Top Likes Received (30 Days)
None yet
The UBB.Developers Network (UBB.Dev/Threads.Dev) is ©2000-2025 VNC Web Services

 
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.1
(Snapshot build 20240918)